Browse
our Frontpage
No smiles in the Senate


Are we in such a bad shape that an agreement brings more unhappiness than a fight? The answer is yes.
The “gang of 14,” seven Republicans and seven Democrats came with an eleventh hour agreement to avoid the nuclear option. Obviously, compromise means everyone lose something, but supposedly, everybody also wins.

Not this time, it seems.
Democrats agreed to allow the confirmation of three extremely conservatives judges; in exchange the Republicans agreed no to allow Frist to pull the trigger of the nuclear bomb that would have brought down in flames all those constitutional chapters we hold dear.

Somehow, Democrats’ victory chants were a bit louder than the Republicans’.
But that does not mean that some groups aren’t complaining on the Democrats’ camp. Planned Parenthood sent an email warning that the compromise hurts women, in anticipation of the sure fire confirmation of Priscilla Owen, who while sitting on the Texas Supreme Court wrote a number of opinions concerning the application of the Texas law mandating parental notice before a minor may obtain an abortion.

The Texas law provides a “judicial bypass,” a proceeding that allows a mature minor, or a minor for whom parental involvement would not be in her best interests, to obtain a waiver of the parental involvement requirement. Justice Owen’s opinions have sought to impose a standard of proof on a minor seeking a judicial bypass that, in the words of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales who was also a justice on the Texas Supreme Court, would “create hurdles that simply are not to be found in the words of the statute” and would be “an unconscionable act of judicial activism.”

Of course, now Gonzales is finding words to say that’s not what he said.
Then comes the worst of the worst, Janice Rogers Brown, an associate justice on the California Supreme Court, who counts with the opposition of pretty much every organization without a corporate backing; and with the support of many corporations.

Even Republican pundits say that any other candidate proposed by president Bush would be to the left of Rogers, probably because there is no room on her right side. Many Democrats think that was too much of a concession, but still insist the compromise was the best possible solution to keep checks and balances in place, along with that old fashioned thing called democracy.

But to see unhappiness one needs to hear what the extreme right is saying.
Focus on the Family Action Chairman Dr. James C. Dobson blasted the compromise as a “a complete bailout and betrayal by a cabal of Republicans and a great victory for united Democrats... The rules that blocked conservative nominees remain in effect, and nothing of significance has changed.”

The extreme right feels it has such a stronghold on the American culture and politics that the smell of a compromise nauseates them. It doesn’t seem to matter that most Americans considered the nuclear option an abuse of power by Republicans. Nor even the majority is important enough to these God-fearing zealots who are convinced they can rewrite the Constitution as needed.

 



Washington Hoy Editor:

Thank you for writing and printing “Is being tolerant right?” [Editorial on May 20, 2005] As a gay Hispanic make, I was pleasantly surprise when I read the editorial. When it comes to race, ethnicity, class and sexuality, we need to move beyond just tolerance in our communities.

I’m a gay Hispanic male and I don’t want to be simply tolerated as a gay man, but I want my community to respect me and recognize my contributions and the contributions of other gay and lesbian Hispanic/Latinos to our families and communities. Tolerance is superficial, I want to be embraced, accepted, respected and seen as an equal. Honest dialogues about the realities of gay and lesbian individuals are needed so our families and communities can understand us and thus begin the affirmation process of gay and lesbian Hispanic/Latinos.

Once again, thank you for the editorial. It’s my wish that the editorial serves as a catalyze for much needed dialogue.

Octavio N. Espinal
Washington, DC