Browse
our Frontpage
Food Stamps, a children's life saver

Washington Hoy
Click to open PDF file
Isabel M. Estrada Portales
06/17/2005


While there has been an increase in the number of hungry families in US, a recent proposal on the House of Representatives, overwhelming defeated, attempted to cut immigrant access to food stamps, a program that is a life saver alternative to, among many other, the 22.5 percent of Hispanics in poverty.

The amendment to the “Agriculture Appropriations Act of FY 2006” introduced by Rep. Scott Garrett, Republican from New Jersey, was rejected by a vote of 169-258.

“We applaud the many members of Congress, including Hispanic leaders Rep. Henry Bonilla (R-TX) and Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), who stood in strong bipartisan opposition to this proposal,” said Janet Murguia, President and CEO of the National Council of La Raza (NCLR).

In 2003, 11.2 percent of families in the United States experienced hunger, compared with 10.1 percent in 1999, according to most recent official figures, released on National Hunger Awareness Day, held this year on Tuesday, June 7.
Hunger is defined as the uneasy or painful sensation caused by lack of food. Hunger and poverty are directly correlated. The immigrant community and minority populations have the largest share of the 12.5 percent of the population that lives below the federal threshold for poverty, in all, 35.9 million people, including 12.9 million children, in 2003.

The poverty rates for children, African Americans, Hispanics, and single moms were much higher than the national average. Among children, the poverty rate was 17.6 percent. African Americans had a 24.4 percent poverty rate. For, Hispanics, it was 22.5 percent. About 28 percent of female-headed families were poor.

“Issues of hunger and food insecurity in communities throughout the country don’t need to be muddied by extraneous anti-immigrant bills. We need to ensure that our nation’s hungry are receiving the food assistance that will enable them to go to school, go to work, and fully contribute in the U.S,” commented Murguia.

Some pediatricians worry that cuts in welfare aid proposed in President George W. Bush's 2006 budget will only exacerbate the situation. By contrast Bush plans to keep tax cuts for more affluent sectors of the population, they note.

Dr. Deborah Frank, a professor of pediatrics at Boston University's School of Medicine, who also runs a specialised clinic for malnourished babies, has similar concerns.

"We are seeing more and more very young babies under a year of age which is a particular concern because they are most likely to die of under nutrition, and also their brains are growing very very rapidly," said Frank, in a telephone interview with AFP.

"A baby's brain increases 2.5 times in size in the first year of life," she said, adding that if the baby fails to get the nutritional building blocks he or she needs for the brain to develop, lifelong difficulties in behaviour and learning can result.

But infant-child protection centers do not exist in the United States, unlike it other countries, such as France, making children below the age of three or four years old somewhat invisible to authorities, lamented Frank.

"They don't come to my clinic until they are already quite underweight," she said. "Recently I have been alarmed because we are getting more children who are so ill that they go to hospital rather than they come to the clinic first," a situation which, in 20 years of practising medicine, Frank had earlier seen reversed.

Here in the District of Columbia, the poverty rate for children is 35.2 percent compared with 17.6 percent nationally, the highest in the nation. This translates to 100,000 children at risk of hunger in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area – 35,000 in the District alone or 1 in 3 children. In Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties, 1 in 4 children is at risk of hunger and in Northern Virginia, 1 in 5.